The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.prashanth Projects Ltd
High Court
28 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.prashanth Projects Ltd
Date of order
28 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.prashanth Projects Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.47 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.582 OF 2005
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3075 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Prashanth Projects Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr.Balasaheb Yewale i/b.Rajesh Shah & Co. for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 28TH AUGUST, 2009
DATE :
1.Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Needless to mention that even if the reasons were found to be recorded, they were not communicated to the assessee. Mere recording the evidence do not serve the ends of justice, communication of the reasons is mandatory. In this case, no communication has been effected on the assessee. No case is made out to review the order dated 16[th] October, 2008. Hence, the Review Application stands dismissed.
2.In the above view of the matter, no useful purpose would be served by allowing the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay in filing the Review Petition. Hence, the same also stands dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.