The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.rachana Udyog
High Court
09 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.rachana Udyog
Date of order
09 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.rachana Udyog, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Considering the cause shown, delay condoned.Office to register the appeal.Office objections, if any, to be removed within six weeks from today, failing which appeal to stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4428 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2623 of 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Rachana Udyog ..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 9th February, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 9th February, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Considering the cause shown, delay
condoned.Office to register the appeal.Office
objections, if any, to be removed within six weeks
from today, failing which appeal to stand dismissed
for non-prosecution. Liberty to the respondents to
apply for recall of the order in the event they are
not served.
(R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue