In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.rachna Trust, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1676 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.586 OF 2009WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1677 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.589 OF 2009WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1678 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.587 OF 2009WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1679 2009IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.588 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.M/s.Rachna Trust
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/b.Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 17[th] June,2009
DATE :
The delay in filing the above appeals is of 8 days. For the reasons stated in the affidavits, delay is condoned. Notices of Motion are made absolute.
Registry is directed to register all the appeals and place them for admission.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue