Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.re...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.regal Shoes

High Court 10 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Dec 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.regal Shoes, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1306 OF 2006 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.354 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax....Appellant Vs. M/s.Regal Shoes ....Respondent Mr.B.M. Chatterji with Mrs. P.P. Bhosale for theAppellant. Ms.Chaitra Rao i/b. M.& M. Legal Ventures for theRespondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 10TH DECEMBER 2007 CORAM : F.I. REBELLO P.C. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.