Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ri...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.riyaz Trading Limited

High Court 13 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.riyaz Trading Limited
Date of order
13 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.riyaz Trading Limited, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the notice of motion along with the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON NOTICE OF MOTION NO.845 OF 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.403 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Applicant. Versus M/s.Riyaz Trading Limited .. Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the applicant. Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 13TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C. : 1. The question of law which has been framed in this Appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court in Income Tax Application No.11 of 1999 decided on 11th June, 2007 [C.I.T. V/s. Lazor Syntex Limited]. 2. In view of the above judgment, the question as framed would not arise. Hence, the notice of motion along with the appeal is dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan