The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sagar Malkani Associates
High Court
26 Mar 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sagar Malkani Associates
Date of order
26 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sagar Malkani Associates, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Considering the cause shown the impugned order is set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2832 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1245 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Sagar Malkani Associates....Respondent
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the Appellant.
Mr. P.C. Tripathi with Mr. Atul K. Jasani, for
the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Considering the cause shown the impugned
order is set aside. Appeal restored to file.
Appeal to be placed for admission on its own turn.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue