In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.schenectady Hardillia Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal 2.In view of the withdrawal of the Appeal, theabove Notice of Motion also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.942 OF 2003WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2968 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.M/s.Schenectady Hardillia Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2007P.C.1.The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeksleave to withdraw the above Appeal. The allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.Permissible Court Fees be refunded to the Appellant.
Appeal
2.In view of the withdrawal of the Appeal, theabove Notice of Motion also stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue