Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shah Brothers

High Court 11 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shah Brothers
Date of order
11 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shah Brothers, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.482 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant Vs. M/s.Shah Brothers...............Respondents Mr. P.S.Sahadevan, for the Appellant. Mr. S.N. Inamdar with Mr. A.K. Jasani, for the respondents. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008 P.C.: P.C.: . The Tribunal relied on the judgment of this Court in CIT vs. Bhimji Bhanjee & Co. 146 ITR 145 to hold that the admission of income of assessee cannot be equated to admission of concealment of income for levy of penalty. The Tribunal found that in the instant case there was no conscious concealment based on the facts before it. Learned Counsel for the Respondent points out that in similar situation the Supreme Court did not interfere with the exercise of discretion by this Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Suresh Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. SureshChandra Mittal, 251 ITR 9. Considering the finding Chandra Mittal, 251 ITR 9 of fact recorded by the Tribunal and the judgment of the Supreme Court in our opinion the question of law as framed would not arise and consequently Appeal dismissed. (-2-) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan