The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shah Brothers
High Court
11 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shah Brothers
Date of order
11 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shah Brothers, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.482 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Shah Brothers...............Respondents
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan, for the Appellant.
Mr. S.N. Inamdar with Mr. A.K. Jasani, for the
respondents.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The Tribunal relied on the judgment of this
Court in CIT vs. Bhimji Bhanjee & Co. 146 ITR 145
to hold that the admission of income of assessee
cannot be equated to admission of concealment of
income for levy of penalty. The Tribunal found that
in the instant case there was no conscious
concealment based on the facts before it. Learned
Counsel for the Respondent points out that in
similar situation the Supreme Court did not
interfere with the exercise of discretion by this
Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Suresh
Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. SureshChandra Mittal, 251 ITR 9. Considering the finding
Chandra Mittal, 251 ITR 9
of fact recorded by the Tribunal and the judgment of
the Supreme Court in our opinion the question of law
as framed would not arise and consequently Appeal
dismissed.
(-2-)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.