The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shapoorji Pallonji & Co.ltd
High Court
13 Mar 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shapoorji Pallonji & Co.ltd
Date of order
13 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shapoorji Pallonji & Co.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: In these applications following substantial question of law is sought to be raised:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in concelling the order u/s.104 of the Act passed by the Assessing Officer.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.177 OF 1999
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Petitioner
V/s
M/s.Shapoorji Pallonji & Co.Ltd. .. Respondent
WITH
WITH
WITH
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.178 OF 1999
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Petitioner
V/s
M/s.Shapoorji Pallonji & Co.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.A.Kotangale for the Petitioner.
Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent.
DATE : 13th March, 2007.
P.C.:
1. The above applications pertain to the Assessment
Years 1986-1987 and 1987-1988. In these applications
following substantial question of law is sought to be
raised:-
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case, the Tribunal was right in law in concelling the order u/s.104 of the Act passed by the Assessing
Officer.
2. Perused the judgment and order of the Tribunal dated
3rd July, 1997. The Tribunal has cancelled levy of
additional income tax under Section 104 of the Income
Tax Act on the ground that the Tribunal itself had
followed its own order of the earlier year
viz.Assessment Year 1981-1982 to Assessment Year
1985-1986. In view of the same, since the Revenue has
accepted the said order, no useful purpose will be
served by calling for the statement of the case. There
is no substantial question of law involved in these
applications. Hence, both the applications stand
dismissed.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.