The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shell Inn International Ltd
High Court
03 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shell Inn International Ltd
Date of order
03 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shell Inn International Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1499 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1499 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1499 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.501 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.501 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Shell Inn International Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd June, 2008
DATE : 3rd June, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
this Notice of Motion the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 285 days delay caused in filing the
Appeal. The Appellant has challenged the ITAT’s order
dated 22.12.2006. The Chief CIT had granted approval
for filing the appeal on 3.5.2007, however the Appeal
came to be filed belatedly on 20.2.2008. Perusal of the
affidavit in support shows that the delay was caused due
to non-availability of Court fee stamps and for other
reasons beyond the control of the Appellant’s office
etc. The aforestated reasons given by the Appellant
however does not appear to be justifiable. No
sufficient cause is shown for condonation of delay.
Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
2. In view of dismissal of Notice of Motion, the ITXA
(L) No.501/2008 also stands dismissed.
(A.P.BHANGALE J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(A.P.BHANGALE J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.