Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shukra Diamond Exports Ltd

High Court 10 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shukra Diamond Exports Ltd
Date of order
10 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.shukra Diamond Exports Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.983 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Vs. M/s.Shukra Diamond Exports Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.R.Asokan for the Appellant.Mr.Jitendra Jain a/w.A.K.Jasani and Mr.P.C.Tripathifor the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. 1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. In the above, the Appellant is seeking to raise thefollowing substantial questions of law: and as such the Assessee is entitled to the deduction and also depreciation thereon. 3.Over and above, the learned Counsel for the Government under Section 269 AA of the Companies Act,1956. of law involved in the above. The Appeal is totally devoid of merits. Hence, the same stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan