Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.s....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.s.k. Exports

High Court 23 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.s.k. Exports
Date of order
23 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.s.k. Exports, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2632 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.990 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant Vs. M/s.S.K. Exports ..Respondents Mr.S.M.Shah i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Apellant. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&A.A.SAYED,JJ.DATED: 23RD JULY,2007 CORAM: F.I. A.A.SAYED DATED: 23RD JULY,2007 P.C.: P.C.: . There is a delay of 281 days in preferring the appeal. The last date for preferring the Appeal was 12th November, 2003. The file was sent to the Ministry of law on 11th November, 2003. The draft appeal memo was received on 6th July, 2004 i.e. nearly after 8 months. There is no explanation. In our opinion the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan