Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sp...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.spaco Carburettors (I) Pvt. Ltd

High Court 01 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.spaco Carburettors (I) Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
01 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.spaco Carburettors (I) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed as barred by limitation on the statement made by learned Counsel for the appellant.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2436 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s.Spaco Carburettors (I) Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.Rajesh Poojari i/b. Mulla & Mulla for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009 DATE : P.C. Delay in filing the appeal is of 1204 days. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that no Notice of Motion has been taken out for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed as barred by limitation on the statement made by learned Counsel for the appellant. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan