The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.special Steels Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.special Steels Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.special Steels Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above there is no merit in this Appeal which is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.301 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Special Steels Ltd.......Respondents
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant.
Mr. S.S. Shetty, for the Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The Question No.1 as framed is covered by
the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 290
ITR 667 in favour of the assessee. Question No.2 is
covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court
reported in 261 ITR 275 (S.C.). In the light of the
above there is no merit in this Appeal which is
accordingly dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue