Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.st...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.star Chemicals (Bom) Ltd

High Court 07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.star Chemicals (Bom) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.510 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.510 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.510 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Star Chemicals (Bom) Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr.Deepak Tralshawalla with Mr.V.S.Hadade for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 7th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. As the tax effect involved in this Appeal is less than Rs.4 lakhs, we are not inclined to entertain this Appeal in view of the Board’s Circular. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.