Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.st...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sterlite Telecom Ltd

High Court 31 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sterlite Telecom Ltd
Date of order
31 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sterlite Telecom Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.990 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1163 of 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax....Appellant Vs. M/s.Sterlite Telecom Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: MARCH 31, 2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: MARCH 31, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . Considering the cause shown and subject to appellants paying to the respondents cost quantified at Rs.2500/- within six weeks from today and removing office objections, if any within the stipulated period, office to register the appeal. On failure to pay the cost or remove the office objections, motion to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to this court. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan