Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.su...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sulphur Mills Limited

High Court In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

—

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sulphur Mills Limited, the High Court dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1.Appellant to remove all office objections within 4 weeks from today and get the appeal registered, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1210 OF 2008AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1211 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax VersusM/s.Sulphur Mills Limited ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.Ajay R. Singh & Mr.P.S. Savla for the respondents. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1214 OF 2008 Mahendra P. KanakiaVersusThe Income Tax Officer, Ward 21(1)(3), Mumbai & Anr. ..Appellant...Respondents. Mr.V.S. Hadade for the appellant.Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1219 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 18, MumbaiVersusM/s.K.K.C., Mumbai ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellantMr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1.Appellant to remove all office objections within 4 weeks from today and get the appeal registered, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.