Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.su...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sundale Merchandise Pvt.ltd

High Court 21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sundale Merchandise Pvt.ltd
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sundale Merchandise Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.7 OF 2006WITH INTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.7 OF 2006 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1842 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1842 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1842 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Sundale Merchandise Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008 DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. As the tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/- in the above matter, the learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the above Appeal. Hence, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court Fees be refunded to the Appellant, as per rules. 2. In view of the withdrawal of the above Appeal, nothing further survives in the Notice of Motion. Hence, the same stands dismissed. (SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan