The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.tata Ssl Ltd
High Court
17 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.tata Ssl Ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S.tata Ssl Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.292 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Tata SSL Ltd...RespondentMr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani with Mr. S.S.Shetty for RespondentCORAM : F.I. REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 17TH DECEMBER 2007
P.C.
P.C.
.
Admitted on the following question:-
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the Tribunal was justified in law in confirmingthe order of CIT (A) and directing the AssessingOfficer to allow expenses on rent and repairs ofguest house and expenses on food and provision,overlooking the decision of this Hon’ble Court in thecase of M/s.Ocean Carriers (P) Ltd. (211 ITR 357)and Raja Bahadur Motilal Poona Mills Ltd. (212 ITR175)?"
2.In so far as expenses of rent and repairs of guest house the issue is covered by Britannia Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (2005) 287 ITR 546
(S.C.).
In so far as latter part of the question regarding
expenses on food and provisions learned Counsel for the
respondents states that considering that the expenses are
only about Rs.97,833/- on the facts of this case they are
not pressing the same.
4.
In the light of that the question will have to be
answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Appeal disposed of accordingly.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
REBELLO, J)
(F.I.REBELLO, J)
(F.I.
REBELLO, J)
(F.I.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.