The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.tata Telecom Ltd
High Court
24 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.tata Telecom Ltd
Date of order
24 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.tata Telecom Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2137 OF 2009
IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1984 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax.
... Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Tata Telecom Ltd.
... Respondent
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C.
DATE :- 24[th] July, 2009.
The appeal is delayed by 154 days. Following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Notice of motion is, therefore, rejected. Appeal papers be consigned to record.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue