The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.thakur Bros Agricultural Farm
High Court
11 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.thakur Bros Agricultural Farm
Date of order
11 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.thakur Bros Agricultural Farm, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2008 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Thakur Bros Agricultural Farm..Respondent
Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for
the Appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani, for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The question of law is formulated in para.4.
The matter pertains to penalty. Revenue was in
Appeal against the order of CIT (Appeals). The
Tribunal after considering the record noted that it
could not be said that the assessee had furnished
inaccurate particulars or has concealed income.
Further there was no malafide intention brought out
by the Revenue to show that the assessee had
willfully submitted inaccurate particulars with an
intent to conceal the income or had made a false
claim. Considering the said findings the learned
Tribunal confirmed the order of CIT (Appeals).
Considering that there are two concurrent findings
of fact the question of law as framed would not
arise and consequently Appeal dismissed.
(-2-)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.