In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.tips Industries Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In view of the dismissal of the above Notices of Motion, both the above Appeals stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3540 OF 2008IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.240 OF 2008
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3542 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.239 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.M/s.Tips Industries Pvt.Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.Deepak Talashiwala with Mr.V.S.Hadade for theRespondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythese Notices of Motion, the Appellant is seeking thecondonation of 572 days’ delay in filing both the
above Appeals. Perused the Notices of Motion and
Affidavits-in-support thereof.
:2:were beyond the control of the Revenue. We are not at
all satisfied with the reasons given for condoning the
delay. Hence, the Notices of Motion stand dismissed.
3.In view of the dismissal of the above Notices
of Motion, both the above Appeals stand dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue