The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.topaz Holding Pvt. Ltd
High Court
09 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.topaz Holding Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
09 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.topaz Holding Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4159 OF 2008 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1762 OF 2008
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4159 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1762 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s.Topaz Holding PVt. Ltd. ... Respondent
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4160 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4160 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1758 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1758 OF 200
WITH
8 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4161 OF 200
8 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4161 OF 200
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1757 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4162 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1757 OF 200
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4162 OF 2008
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2289 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2289 OF 2008
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellants.
None for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200
P.C.
. Considering that the delay is 34 days and considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeals.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue