In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.tube Craft, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: All the above appeals are dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.723 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.724 OF 2009WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.729 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Tube Craft
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.D.K.Kamwal for appellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry i/b.Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
P.C.
Heard.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 11[th] June,2009
DATE :
After having examined the judgment of the Tribunal in general and findings recorded in paragraph No.5 of the judgment in particular, we find no fault with the view taken by the Tribunal. No substantial question of law is involved in the present appeals. All the above appeals are dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue