In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.valblanc Chemie Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence,the appeal is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.568 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
vs.
M/s.Valblanc Chemie Pvt.Ltd....Respondent.---
Mr.Suresh Kumar, for Appellant.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:15[th] September,2008.
P.C.:-1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing forappellant. There are two questions of law framed.They do not arise from the order of the tribunal. Thefindings recorded by the tribunal are essentiallyfindings of facts. No question of law arises. Hence,the appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
2
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue