Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.ve...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.veerprabhu Export House

High Court 20 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.veerprabhu Export House
Date of order
20 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.veerprabhu Export House, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Issue: Admit on the following question:- "(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT is right in directing to treat the unrealized sale proceeds of exports as local sales and further directing to reduce the direct and indirect cost of such sales without appre...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.149 of 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ...........Appellant Vs. M/s.Veerprabhu Export House........Respondent Mr.A.S. Shivsharan, for the Appellant None for the respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 20th February,2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 20th February,2009 P.C. P.C. . Admit on the following question:- "(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT is right in directing to treat the unrealized sale proceeds of exports as local sales and further directing to reduce the direct and indirect cost of such sales without appreciating the provisions of Sec.80HHC of the IT Act, 1961. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was correct to include the excess provision of last year’s credit amounting to (-2-) Rs.5,25,512/- and written off in this year, for computing deduction u/s.80HHC, though this is deemed income as per the provisions of Sec.41 of the IT Act and has no nexus with the export activity and export profit of the previous year relevant to A.Y. 1998-99." (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan