In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.vishindas Holaram, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1520 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Vishindas Holaram
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.K.R.Choudhary i/b.Ms.Anuradha Mane for appellant.
Ms.Aarti Sathe for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 7TH OCTOBER, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Perused appeal.
The question of law sought to be raised in the appeal, does not arise from the impugned order. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue