The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.vita Investments And Trading Co. Pvt.ltd
High Court
10 Nov 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.vita Investments And Trading Co. Pvt.ltd
Date of order
10 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.vita Investments And Trading Co. Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Learned CIT (A)erred in law in holding that the loss ofRs.38,57,659/- incurred on sale of part B of Hseries Debentures and NCDS of J SeriesDebentures of M/s.Reliance Industries Ltd. isadmissible as a genuine loss and was acontrived loss a...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.181 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax,..AppellantVs.M/s.Vita Investments and TradingCo. Pvt.Ltd...Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.Mr.J.D.Mistry a/w. Mr.Raj Darak for the Respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 10TH NOVEMBER, 2008
.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. In
the above, the Appellant is seeking to raise the
following substantial questions of law:
a. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Learned CIT (A)erred in law in holding that the loss ofRs.38,57,659/- incurred on sale of part B of Hseries Debentures and NCDS of J SeriesDebentures of M/s.Reliance Industries Ltd. isadmissible as a genuine loss and was acontrived loss as held by the AssessingOfficer?b. On the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Learned CIT(A) erred indirecting the Assessing Officer to allowdeduction u/s.80-M in respect of the grossamount of dividends without adjusting anyproportionate amount of interest attributableto the dividend income.
the present Appeal. Hence, the same stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.