Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Muksh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Muksh G.desai (Huf

High Court 07 Oct 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Muksh G.desai (Huf
Date of order
07 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Muksh G.desai (Huf, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 2.The question sought to be raised in the appeal revolves around the question as to whether the respondent assessee was entitled for benefit of exemption under Section 54(F) of the Income Tax Act.

Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1766 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Muksh G.Desai (HUF) ..Appellant ..Respondent Ms.Suchitra Kamble for appellant.Ms.Aarti Sathe for respondent. P.C. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 7TH OCTOBER, 2009 DATE : 1.Heard learned Counsel for the parties.Perused appeal.Perused appeal. 2.The question sought to be raised in the appeal revolves around the question as to whether the respondent assessee was entitled for benefit of exemption under Section 54(F) of the Income Tax Act. We were taken through the order of the Tribunal. The Tribunal has considered the factual as well as legal position and has relied upon the earlier judgment of the Tribunal which is still holding the field in the case of Asstt. CIT Vs. Smt.Sunder Kaur Sujan Singh Gadh (2005) 3 SOT 206 (Mum)and also a judgment of the M.P.High Court in the case of Smt.Shashi Varma. The Tribunal has also relied upon a Circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes which is binding on the Revenue. 3.Taking over-all view, no perversity could be demonstrated by the Revenue in the impugned order. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan