In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Muksh G.desai (Huf, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 2.The question sought to be raised in the appeal revolves around the question as to whether the respondent assessee was entitled for benefit of exemption under Section 54(F) of the Income Tax Act.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1766 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Muksh G.Desai (HUF)
..Appellant
..Respondent
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for appellant.Ms.Aarti Sathe for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 7TH OCTOBER, 2009
DATE :
1.Heard learned Counsel for the parties.Perused appeal.Perused appeal.
2.The question sought to be raised in the appeal revolves around the question as to whether the respondent assessee was entitled for benefit of exemption under Section 54(F) of the Income Tax Act. We were taken through the order of the Tribunal. The Tribunal has considered the factual as well as legal position and has relied upon the earlier judgment of the Tribunal which is still holding the field in the case of Asstt. CIT Vs. Smt.Sunder Kaur Sujan Singh Gadh (2005) 3 SOT 206 (Mum)and also a judgment of the M.P.High Court in the case of Smt.Shashi Varma. The Tribunal has also relied upon a Circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes which is binding on the Revenue.
3.Taking over-all view, no perversity could be demonstrated by the Revenue in the impugned order. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.