Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nalwa...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd

High Court 21 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd
Date of order
21 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIR-15 + ITA 556/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus NALWA SONS INVESTMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms Kavita Jha, Mr Vaibhav Kulkarni and Ms Devika Jain, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 21.02.2019 1. While admitting this appeal on 5[th] May, 2011, the following order was passed: “CM No. 5228/2010 The delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned. This application stands disposed of. ITA 556/2010 The counsel for the parties have been heard. Admit. The following substantial question of law arises for the consideration of this court:- “Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal erred in setting aside the disallowance under Section 80 HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 while computing the Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) under Section 115 JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961” The paper books be filed by the appellant within three months as per rules. Tag alongwith ITA No.875/2008.” 2. Mr Asheesh Jain, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue has produced before the Court the order passed by this Court on 5[th] May, 2011 in ITA No.875/2008, answering the question in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue relying on Ajanta Pharma Ltd. v CIT 327 ITR 305. 3. In that view of the matter, the question is answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. 4. The appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J. SANJEEV NARULA, J. FEBRUARY 21, 2019 rd
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan