Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Naptha...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Naptha Jhakri Joint Venture

High Court 24 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Naptha Jhakri Joint Venture
Date of order
24 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Naptha Jhakri Joint Venture, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2164 OF 2009IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 947 OF 2004ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2165 OF 2009IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 948 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax. Vs.Naptha Jhakri Joint Venture. ... Appellant... Respondent Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant. Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent. P.C. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE :- 24[th] July, 2009. The present notices of motion are taken out after lapse of five years to get the appeals restored; wherein the order of the Tribunal dated 25[th] February 2004 pertaining to the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98 was challenged. Both appeals were dismissed in default. Thereafter, appeal of the very same assessee bearing No.166/2006 for the assessment year 2000-01 involving identical question of law came up for hearing before this Court. Relying upon the earlier order for the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98 the said Appeal No.166/2006 was dismissed. Under these circumstances, since the earlier order has been acted upon in the consequent appeal, we do not see any reasons to grant these notices of motion. Even otherwise, delay in moving these notices almost more than 5 years has not been explained. No sufficient cause has been shown. No facts and particulars are to be found. Both notices of motion are, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan