Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.n. B...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.n. Bhojwani (Huf

High Court 07 Aug 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.n. Bhojwani (Huf
Date of order
07 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.n. Bhojwani (Huf, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Income Tax Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.841 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant. Versus N.N. Bhojwani (HUF) .. Respondent. Mrs.P.P. Bhosale with Mr.B.M. Chatterjee for the appellant. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C. : 1. The assessee - respondent herein had preferred an appeal before the I.T.A.T. on the findings recorded by the C.I.T. (A) that the partition has taken place. The learned Tribunal, after considering the facts on record arrived at a conclusion that there was total partition in the HUF and accordingly allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent herein. 2. We have perused the impugned order. Considering the deed of partition and that the share of each member in the HUF has been paid his share, the Tribunal recorded a finding of fact that the partition was final. We find that there is no perversity in the said finding neither has anything brought nothing brought to our attention to show 2 that any material on record was not considered by the Tribunal. The question of law as raised would not arise. 3. The Income Tax Appeal is dismissed. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan