In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.n. Bhojwani (Huf, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The Income Tax Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.841 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant.
Versus
N.N. Bhojwani (HUF) .. Respondent.
Mrs.P.P. Bhosale with Mr.B.M. Chatterjee for the
appellant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2007.
P.C. :
1. The assessee - respondent herein had
preferred an appeal before the I.T.A.T. on the
findings recorded by the C.I.T. (A) that the
partition has taken place. The learned Tribunal,
after considering the facts on record arrived at a
conclusion that there was total partition in the HUF
and accordingly allowed the appeal preferred by the
respondent herein.
2. We have perused the impugned order.
Considering the deed of partition and that the share
of each member in the HUF has been paid his share,
the Tribunal recorded a finding of fact that the
partition was final. We find that there is no
perversity in the said finding neither has anything
brought nothing brought to our attention to show
2
that any material on record was not considered by
the Tribunal. The question of law as raised would
not arise.
3. The Income Tax Appeal is dismissed.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.