The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Noneappearsfortherespondent,<Br>Though<Br>Served
High Court
23 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Noneappearsfortherespondent,<Br>Though<Br>Served
Date of order
23 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Noneappearsfortherespondent,<Br>Though<Br>Served, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2934 OF 2008
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.64 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Vs.L/H of Shri Ranbir Raj KapoorMr.Ram Upadhyay for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
..Appellant
..Respondent
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 23RD OCTOBER, 2008
P.C.
part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is
made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.Place the above Appeal on board for admissionon 24th November,2008. Meanwhile, the Appellant
shall
serve the Respondent with a copy of the Memo of Appeal
along with all annexures.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue