Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Notice...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Notice Of Motion

High Court 09 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Notice Of Motion
Date of order
09 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Notice Of Motion, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.703 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2651 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Gateway Hotels and Gateway Resorts Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Mr.Rajesh Poojari i/b. MINT & Conferers for respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1466 OF 2009 WITHWEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.692 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1467 OF 2009WITHWELATH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.693 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.M/s.Manugraph India Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1472 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.4159 OF 2008 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1511 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.501 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tata Electric Companies Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Mr.Kaushik Sochannam i/b.Ajit Shah for respondent. ..Appellant ..Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1503 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.495 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1504 OF 2009WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.500 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1505 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.494 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1515 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3726 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co.Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Mr.Kaushik Sochannam i/b.Ajit Shah for respondent. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1512 OF 2009 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.4127 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Tata Power Co.Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Mr.Kaushik Sochannam i/b.Ajit Shah for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 9TH JULY, 2009 DATE : P.C. 1.The delay in filing the above appeals is ranging from 91 days to 1242 days. Admittedly, all these appeals are barred by limitation. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.In this view of the matter, all the above Notices of Motion are dismissed being barred by limitation. 3.In view of dismissal of Notices of Motion, appeal papers be consigned to record. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan