The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Preeti J.chauhan
High Court
21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Preeti J.chauhan
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Preeti J.chauhan, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3037 OF 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3037 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1812 OF 2007
INTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1812 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant
Vs.
Preeti J.Chauhan ..Respondent
Mr.R.G.Bhat for the Appellant.
Ms.Asifa Khan for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA
DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 253 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal against the order dated 19/06/2006 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Perused the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion. It
appears that the last date for filing of Appeal was
30/11/2006. The Commissioner of Income Tax had granted
approval for filing an Appeal on 27/11/2006 however, the
Appeal came to be filed belatedly on 09/08/2007 i.e.
after a lapse of 253 days.
2. The reasons given for delay that of getting the
draft memo of Appeal prepared and non-availability of
Court fee stamps etc. does not appear to be
justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for
condoning the delay. We are not satisfied with the
reasons given for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice
of Motion stands dismissed.
3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion,
Interest Tax Appeal (L) No.1812 of 2007 also stands
dismissed.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.