Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Procte...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Procter & Gamble India Limited

High Court 25 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Procter & Gamble India Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1204 OF 2000 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1204 OF 2000 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Procter & Gamble India Limited ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Ms. Payal Parikh i/by M & M Legal Venture for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009 DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009 DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . As the tax incidence is less than Rs. 4 lakhs, the learned counsel does press the Appeal. Hence, Appeal dismissed. Refund of court Fees as per rules. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.