The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
High Court
25 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
25 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1989 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 25TH AUGUST, 2009
DATE :
P.C.
Learned Counsel for the appellant fairly states, that so far as question Nos.(1) and (3) are concerned, the same are covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2008) 301 ITR 191 and question No.(2) is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kisanvir Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. decided on 30th June, 2009 in ITXA No.930 of 2008. In this view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue