The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ramacanta Velingkar Minerals
High Court
07 Sep 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ramacanta Velingkar Minerals
Date of order
07 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ramacanta Velingkar Minerals, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 951 OF 2015(Original Tax Appeal No. 17 of 20015)WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 945 OF 2015(Original Tax Appeal No. 26 of 2015)WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 972 OF 2015
(Original Tax Appeal No. 37 of 2015)
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 973 OF 2015(Original Tax Appeal No. 25 of 2015)
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Ramacanta Velingkar Minerals
..Appellant
..Respondent
....
Ms. Asha Desai, Advocate for Appellant.
....CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.DATED : 8 SEPTEMBER 2015
P.C.:
Ms. Desai, the learned Counsel for the revenue states that
all these appeals listed at Sr. No.903 on the today's supplementary
board raises the issue regarding Section 10B of the Income Tax Act,1961. Moreover, the respondent-assessee is represented by thelocal advocate at Goa.
2.In view of the above, she requests that all these appealsbe sent back to Goa Bench of this Court for final disposal afterhearing the parties.
3.Accordingly, Registry is directed to send back all theseappeals to the Goa Bench of this Court.
[G.S. KULKARNI, J]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.