In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Rathi Dye Chem (P) Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 647 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant
vs.
Rathi Dye Chem (P) Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.
Mr.S.N.Inamdar for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties.
2. Mr.Gupta, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant
states that the tax effect is less than of Rs.4,00,000/-
hence he is not pressing this appeal and seeks leave to
withdraw the appeal. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn
and dismissed as such. Permissible court fees be refunded
to the assessee as per rules.
(S.J
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue