The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Regency Creations Ltd
High Court
17 Sep 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Regency Creations Ltd
Date of order
17 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Regency Creations Ltd, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The present appeals are allowed in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA No.69/2008 titled The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RESERVED ON: 31.07.2012
PRONOUNCED ON: 17.09.2012
+ ITANos. 783/2009 & 1239/2011
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellants
Through : Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Sr. Standing counsel with Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocate
versus
REGENCY CREATIONS LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate.
ITA Nos.2002/2010, 438/2012, 439/2012, 440/2012, 441/2012
CIT
….. Appellant
Through : Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Sr. Standing counsel with Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocate
versus
VALIANT COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
….. Respondent
Through : Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajender Aggarwal, Advocate
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR
MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT
%
1. The present appeals are allowed in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA No.69/2008 titled The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Regency Creations Ltd.
(S.RAVINDRA BHAT) JUDGE
17[th] September, 2012
(R.V. EASWAR) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.