In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ricoh (I) Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: (2007) 212 CTR (Bom) 384. impugned order of the tribunal to that extent is set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Ricoh (I) Ltd.
... Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for theAppellant.
Mr. R. Santhanam with Mr.A.K. Jasani forRespondent.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2009
P.C.
. The Revenue is in appeal on the following
question :
(Mannar) Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2007) 212
CTR (Bom) 384.
impugned order of the tribunal to that extent is set
aside.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.