The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.s. Mohite, Jj
High Court
05 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.s. Mohite, Jj
Date of order
05 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.s. Mohite, Jj, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
7 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4381 OF 200 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2192 OF 2006
7 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4381 OF 200
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2192 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Aries Marketing Ltd. Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
. It has been brought to our attention that there
has been an omission in our order dated 04/02/2008.
Though we had directed levy of cost, the amount had
not been quantified. We clarify that the cost
payable would be Rs.2,500/-. The cost to be paid
within eight weeks from today.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue