Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.s. M...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.s. Mohite, Jj

High Court 09 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.s. Mohite, Jj
Date of order
09 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.s. Mohite, Jj, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Smt. Aruna K. Shah ... Respondent Mr. A.S. Shivshartan for the Appellant. Mr. Jeetu Motwani i/by PDS Legal for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. 9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200 9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200 9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The learned tribunal by its order dated 21.11.2006 noted that in respect of Co-sharers there was no transfer. That was subject matter of the appeal before this court in I.T.A. No. 546 of 2008. By order dated 19.9.2008 this court dismissed appeal by concurring with the findings recorded by the tribunal andholding consequently that no substantial questions of law would arise in this matter. . We see no reason to differ with the view taken. Consequently appeal dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan