The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sainara Properties Pvt. Ltd
High Court
04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sainara Properties Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
04 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sainara Properties Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
5 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 147 OF 200
5 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 147 OF 200
5 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 147 OF 200
The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant
Versus
Sainara Properties Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr. V.G. Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
Appellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr. Raj Darak for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: MARCH 04, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 04, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
. The Asessing Officer had determined the annual
letting value under Section 23(1)(a) of the Income
Tax Act. Considering the Judgment of this court in
CIT Vs. J.K.Industries Bombay Limited, 214 ITR 723,
the question of law as framed would nota rise.
Consequently , appeal dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue