Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sarada...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sarada K Khirari

High Court 10 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sarada K Khirari
Date of order
10 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sarada K Khirari, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Works (2005) 276 ITR 519, the appeal is dismissed leaving the question open for consideration in other appropriate matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.654 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant. Versus Sarada K Khirari..Respondent. Mr.N.R. Prajapati for the appellant.Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 10TH JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Admittedly, the tax effect is less than Rs.4 lakhs. Hence, in view of Office Memorandum dated 5-6-2007 issued by the C.B.D.T. and judgments of this Court in CIT V/s. Camco Colour Co (2002) 254 ITR 565 and CITV/s. Pithwa Engg. Works (2005) 276 ITR 519, the appeal is dismissed leaving the question open for consideration in other appropriate matter. (V.C. Daga, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan