The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Satish D.chokshi
High Court
01 Jul 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Satish D.chokshi
Date of order
01 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Satish D.chokshi, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2388 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Satish D.Chokshi
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan a/w. Ms.Anuradha Mane for appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 1ST JULY, 2009
DATE :
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Though the tax effect involved in the present appeal is shown Rs.20/- lac, learned Counsel for the Revenue, on recalculation, submits that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than Rs.4/- lac. In this view of the matter, learned Counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the same. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Permissible Court Fees be refunded to the appellant as per rules.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue