The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shekakha & Co
High Court
03 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shekakha & Co
Date of order
03 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shekakha & Co, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of this matter, appeal is dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 837 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Shekakha & Co.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for appellantNone for the respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 3rd JULY, 2009
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the Revenue.All office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
Appeal is taken for hearing at the request of the Revenue-Appellant. He submits that first issue sought to be raised in this appeal was also raised in Income Tax Appeal No. 1097 of 2007 between the same parties. The said appeal came to be disposed of on 1[st] August, 2008.
So far as the another question is concern, it relates demand, no substantial question of law is involved in the matter. In this view of this matter, appeal is dismissed in limini for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue