The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shree Nivas Niryat Udyog P. Ltd
High Court
31 Oct 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shree Nivas Niryat Udyog P. Ltd
Date of order
31 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shree Nivas Niryat Udyog P. Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1811 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 833 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
Shree Nivas Niryat Udyog P. Ltd.... Respondent
Mr. A.S. Rao for the Appellant.
None for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 31, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
. An affidavit has been filed by one Ms. Benedicta Sequeira, Inspector setting out that the Respondents
have been served.
. There is delay of 245 days in preferring the
appeal. Earlier in support of the Motion, an
affidavit has been filed by Mr. P.O. Kapoor, and
an additional affidavit came to be filed by one Mr.
B.V. Save on 18.10.2007 wherein further particular
have been set out. The reasons for the delay in
preferring the appeal is also set out. The
Respondent though served did not appear.
Considering that the contents of the affidavit have
((-2-))
not been rebutted, in our opinion, the cause shown
would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion
allowed in terms of Prayer Clause (a). Office to
register the appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.