Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Aillak Pannalal Digambar Jain

High Court 18 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

18 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Aillak Pannalal Digambar Jain, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Considering the above, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 161 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 161 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Shri. Aillak Pannalal Digambar Jain Patsanstha Sevakanchi Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan with Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. REBELLO& CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . In respect of the similar Cooperative Society, we have dismissed the appeal and we have taken a note that after the position of law was brought to their notice, they have started accepting the money by cheque. Considering the above, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.