Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri A...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Ashok J. Thawani

High Court 11 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Ashok J. Thawani
Date of order
11 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Ashok J. Thawani, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.338 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant Vs. Shri Ashok J. Thawani ..Respondent Mr. A.D. Kango with Mr. A.S. Rao and Mr. P.S.Sahadevan, for the Appellant. Mr. J.D. Mistry with Mr. A.K. Jasani, for the respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008 P.C.: P.C.: . The question of law is as formulated in para.5. The Tribunal considered the amendment as also the CBDT Circular and considering the facts on record upheld the claim of the assessee and consequently allowed the Appeal. 2. Considering the findings of fact as recorded in our opinion the question of law as framed would not arise and consequently Appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan